Видео

Could light be a spherical 4πr² EM wave over a ‘period of time’ and have particle characteristics relative to the atoms of the Periodic Table when we have the absorption and emission of light? Is the exchange of light photon ∆E=hf energy continuously transforming potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons, as an uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π probabilistic future unfolds? Is the Future relative to our actions with the Planck Constant h/2π being a constant of action within a geometrical spherical 4πr² process that forms the characteristics of 3D space and continuum of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π?

Love you bro. Absolutely sessional marvellous splendid astonishing

Ain't no blackholes y'all...sry. They're not singular objects, the gravity at any point on the 'edge' (event horizon) could never be so strong that you can't just... leave. The 'gravity' is not a singular field, it's gazillions of little itty bitty fields... They add different...

Disregard my last inquiry on energy levels. I just discovered that all elements have an infinite number of potential energy levels into which an electron with sufficient energy can elevate to higher levels. pardon.

Similarly, for any element with just one energy level, how can this photon emission occur for any of those elements when there is just one energy level and thus no opportunity to cross energy levels.

The illustration provided on Hydrogen ... which has just ONE energy level with one valence slot. So how is it possible for the hydrogen electron to move into any other energy level than ONE ? I am a learning novice, pardon. I dont understand this concept.

Super

2 und 3

Gut

Alles kann geregelt werden um den 0 Punkt zu verschieben. Zum Beispiel Vordere Betrachtung vorne Rechts und hinter Links. Und die Pluszeichen genau wie Oben nur in der Mitte Positiv und Negativ. Dann kann ein Bestimmtest punktförmiges in der Mitte Blei und Kupfer angebrach werden zur Schöpfung zu machen.

Schwerkraftstrahler ist ein Bleistab und Plusstrom das an den Beiden Enden zusammenkommen. Kupferstab in Minusstrom an beiden Enden zusammen gemacht. Magnetismusstrahler . Bleistab in Minusstrom an an beiden Enden und Kupferstab mit Plusstrom an beiden Enden.

Mit Regler

3

Gut

2 Kuntstoffschüssel unten Rechts und oben Links Plusstrom Kupfer, Unten Links und Oben Rechts Minusstrom Blei.

E = mc² the dumbest equation in all of physics considering c = distance = Sun's radius: There are 5000 proofs, or all the laws of physics has the Sun’s radius = 299792458 meters You are indoctrinated and domesticated in the whorehouse named modern university. (1) {[ (2 x π x c) m/86400 s] / Sine (c/r); r =Earth radius = 6378137 m)} / (air index =1.000293833) ³ = 29782.03755 m/sec = Earth's orbital speed (2) Sun's visual radius = [(Sun’s actual radius c) /tangent Ecliptic angle] x [1 + (1day/1year)] ² (3) c/r = 2E; E = ecliptic angle (4) Sine (c/r)/ (c/r) = Earth’s rotation speed/Earth’s speed around the Sun.

Isn't a mass "at rest", effectively STILL moving through TIME?

The Phoenicians defined the relation between Sun’s radius c and Earth’s radius r: (c/r) = 2E; E = ecliptic plane angle And confirmed it by the formula **Sun's visual radius = [(actual radius c) /tangent Ecliptic angle] x [1 + (1day/1year)] ²** And added (c/r)/ [sine (c/r)] = Earth’s rotation speed/Earth’s visual revolution speed. The Phoenicians produced the entire solar system as visual effects of Earth’s rotation that alter the circular motion of Earth to a sinusoidal visual and sinusoidal + circular = solar system illusions or classical physics and astronomy, and (sinusoidal - circular) = space-time delusions

Schrodinger was a dumbass! Einstein was the real deal! People dont even know me, so stop judging before you have all the facts.

Amazing!!! I love your videos, can't wait for the next one

Here is the simplified version. Energy can be neither created nor destroyed, only transformed. Acceleration is what transforms it from a solid, to a liquid to a gas. From atomic energy to radiant energy. E=mc where c is the speed of light. Speed is distance/time so Energy equals time. C-squared thus becomes accelerating the radioactive decay rate. Shortening the amount of time it takes to go from atomic energy to radiant energy. E=mc is the basis for all lifespans (absolute acceleration). The photon's wavelength tells it how long (distance) it can travel before it propagates a new photon. E=mc describes the lifespan of the various plants and animals. With (m) mass and (c) metabolic rate determining the organisms lifespan.

I totally loved this.

In 3

Das Errste

Gut

Man muß das Wetter aussuchen egal welcher Himmel. Rot ist Schnee, Braun ist Nebel, Orange ist Hagel, Ockergelb ist Kraupel, Gelb ist Regen, Grün ist Gewitter, Blau ist Sturm, Violett ist Sonnenschein.

기록용

I STILL DONT KNOW WHY YOU TOOK OUT EXTREMELY GOOD VIDEOS OUT THE CHANNEL

This is an interesting problem related to mass energy equivalence. ruclips.net/video/vx2trjqT_K8/видео.html

Man, I'm an Industrial Engineer. I teach Logistics. I have studided parcial derivatives, Calculus etc. When I see these equations I feel comfortable even after some many years after my undergraduation. I have never stared to any industrial problem which used these equations. When you know what it means and how to solve these equations,

My comments is related to Huygen's and Newton's opinion about light. Newton had a huge influence on Science and he blocked light to be studied deeper for many years.

33 minutes to get to the E^2 equation. Now that's some maths!

I am only 17 minutes in, but I am wondering why the charge-repulsion of the equal number of protons in the white dwarf has been completely ignored in all considerations of what forces could support the star against gravitational collapse. It is my understanding that the like-charge repulsive force increases dramatically as the distance between the particles is reduced. Is this force in a very compact star completely negligible compared to EDP?

Wow, this is really what i needed to truly grasp relativity, at least in terms of the path of motion

I am really hopping for more videos. These are fantastic! ❤

Is dark energy centrifugal force?

Great video

We can create such incredible things, but when it came to Politics, Emotions and Relationships, Humankind is a nightmare.

Great video. Seems like you are a short hop from describing an electron in 3-space, showing how wide it is. Maybe you already have

Wonderful video!

You are a life saver bruhhhhh 😭😭

If you didn't understand a thing about it it doesn't mean you're less smart or anything, this was taught using math language, if there was a way to adapt those concepts to your every day language you'd might even comprehend this matter better than those who can understand what's being said Language is like a bridge to deliver information to your mind, if there's no bridge there's no information delivered, so there's no comprehention, and so you have the ilusion of not being smart. The contrary is also true those who can understand the language might have the ilusion of being smarter when speaking in a language that only a few understand, but since we're humans all of us have the inate tendendy to comprehend all of those concepts. our minds do all of these calculations spontaneously, one example of this inate tendency is how your vison work, when you look forward you can tell whether something is close to you or far away, this is thanks to the math inside your brain making a lot of calculus, these calculus are so deep that our consceouss doesn't have time to think about them, so they are deep in our uncosceous, so most of the physics is not about trying to understand how things work but trying to describe and become aware of how our brains are interpreting them

Wow, dimensional analysis is super powerful holy cow

I've seen a lot of videos about the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and they all talk about "adding" waves to create a superposition, but what does that even mean in reality? Why does -seemingly- arbitrarily adding multiple sin and cos functions represent ONE SINGLE ELECTRON moving through space? I understand that Quantum Particles behave like particles and waves, but why does that allow us to add randomly generated sine and cosine functions and use them to represent electrons?

Mass is not an actionable force. Any equation with G (gravitational attraction) in it is flat earth science. Gravity/mass attraction comes from the theory that the earth is a stationary plane that requires mass attraction to keep objects from floating off into space. Hawkings : flat earther. Einstein: flat earther. Newton: flat earther. You have to go all the way to Galileo to find a non flat earther. Mass does not attract mass. The earths motion in space is what creates the tides. E=mc. Mass comes from Acceleration. How can mass create acceleration. These low IQ flat earthers dont even understand basic physics. Worst yet, they are brainwashing everyone to believe in their fake religion.

too bad heres no latex...but. The Einstein field equation Rμν−12Rgμν=8πGc4TμνR_{\mu u} - \frac{1}{2}R g_{\mu u} = \frac{8 \pi G}{c^4} T_{\mu u}Rμν−21Rgμν=c48πGTμν is derived from the following steps: 1. Einstein-Hilbert Action: The action SSS for general relativity is given by: S=116π∫−g d4x (R+2Λ)S = \frac{1}{16 \pi} \int \sqrt{-g} \, d^4x \, (R + 2\Lambda)S=16π1∫−gd4x(R+2Λ) where RRR is the Ricci scalar, Λ\LambdaΛ is the cosmological constant, ggg is the determinant of the metric tensor gμνg_{\mu u}gμν, and d4xd^4xd4x represents the four-dimensional volume element. 2. Variation of the Action: The Einstein field equations are derived by varying the action SSS with respect to the metric tensor gμνg_{\mu u}gμν: δS=116π∫−g d4x (−ΔR+Rμνδgμν+2Λδg)\delta S = \frac{1}{16 \pi} \int \sqrt{-g} \, d^4x \, \left( -\Delta R + R_{\mu u} \delta g^{\mu u} + 2\Lambda \delta g ight)δS=16π1∫−gd4x(−ΔR+Rμνδgμν+2Λδg) where ΔR\Delta RΔR is the variation of the Ricci scalar RRR and δgμν\delta g^{\mu u}δgμν represents the variation of the metric tensor gμνg^{\mu u}gμν. 3. Stress-Energy Tensor: The stress-energy tensor TμνT_{\mu u}Tμν is defined in terms of the Lagrangian density LLL: Tμν=2−g∂(−gL)∂gμνT_{\mu u} = \frac{2}{\sqrt{-g}} \frac{\partial (\sqrt{-g} \mathcal{L})}{\partial g^{\mu u}}Tμν=−g2∂gμν∂(−gL) where L=R+2Λ\mathcal{L} = R + 2\LambdaL=R+2Λ is the Lagrangian density. 4. Derivation of Einstein Field Equations: By equating the variation of the action to zero (principle of stationary action), we obtain: −12ΔR+Rμν−12Rgμν+Λgμν=8πGc4Tμν-\frac{1}{2} \Delta R + R_{\mu u} - \frac{1}{2} R g_{\mu u} + \Lambda g_{\mu u} = \frac{8 \pi G}{c^4} T_{\mu u}−21ΔR+Rμν−21Rgμν+Λgμν=c48πGTμν 5. Simplification: Rearranging terms and using the definition ΔR=Rμν−12Rgμν\Delta R = R_{\mu u} - \frac{1}{2} R g_{\mu u}ΔR=Rμν−21Rgμν, we arrive at the Einstein field equation: Rμν−12Rgμν+Λgμν=8πGc4TμνR_{\mu u} - \frac{1}{2} R g_{\mu u} + \Lambda g_{\mu u} = \frac{8 \pi G}{c^4} T_{\mu u}Rμν−21Rgμν+Λgμν=c48πGTμν Therefore, the equation Rμν−12Rgμν=8πGc4TμνR_{\mu u} - \frac{1}{2} R g_{\mu u} = \frac{8 \pi G}{c^4} T_{\mu u}Rμν−21Rgμν=c48πGTμν is indeed derived rigorously from the Einstein-Hilbert action, where RμνR_{\mu u}Rμν, RRR, gμνg_{\mu u}gμν, Λ\LambdaΛ, GGG, and ccc have specific meanings related to curvature, the cosmological constant, gravitational constant, and the speed of light respectively. It accurately describes how spacetime curvature is related to the distribution of energy and momentum, encompassing the fundamental principles of general relativity. Regarding the statement about Poisson's equation: κ=8πGc4\kappa = \frac{8 \pi G}{c^4}κ=c48πG This relation ensures that in the weak-field limit, the Einstein field equations reduce to Poisson's equation, which describes Newtonian gravity. simple. hz is frequency of light(fastest), speed of light is wawelenght of photon.

:( please come back.

Brilliant explanation!

Can we all agree that the editing is top-notch?

deh-boys.. lolol